There are Australians who vote with their feet.
Australians consult Chiropractors in hundreds of thousands every year and want to develop productive professional healthcare relationships that are about their families health, their healthcare choices and options for care. These healthy and productive relationships do exist between non-medical and medical practitioners; only the individual needs of each patient are in focus, not some inappropriate turf war.
This patient focused approach is helping the individual patient to become informed and involved in decision making and health outcomes, these are the goals of the emerging healthcare system of Australia.
Unfortunately there has been a continued and concerted effort by only some medical doctors’ (these are represented by their unions; AMA in Australia and the AMA in the USA) to destroy the role of chiropractic in the healthcare system in the 70s and 80s.
The CEO of the Chiropractors’ Association of Australia (CAA), Andrew McNamara, has described recent media comments about Chiropractors by the AMA and a group claiming to be friends of science in medicine as “alarmist and offensive.” The comments, published in several newspapers, purported to be concerns about Chiropractors treating children, but Mr McNamara said they did not provide any evidence to back up these concerns. “Chiropractic is safe, effective, affordable and mainstream. These tactics have no place in modern thinking about a healthier Australia. They are the latest instalment of an old and tiresome turf war by the doctors’ union that has nothing to do with patient care,” Mr McNamara said. “Moreover the Chiropractor is a professional thriving in the environment of Australians actively seeking healthy lifestyles and preventative health care advice,” he said.
I remind us all again that the final decision about where a child receives appropriate care is for their parents. I am in private practice and work with a group of general medical practitioners. I observe their dedication to patient-centred outcomes and they are well aware of the services that we are able to provide for their patients.
Chiropractic care for children, my experience
Working at our Springwood practice in the Blue Mountains, within a GP Superclinic, I observe parents bringing their children to the GP and talking about their chiropractor and the improvements they have seen. These parents should be supported in their healthcare decision-making wherever possible.
I very much ask that Mamamia request more research and information from broader based authorities across the world in regards to children and chiropractic benefits. There are authorities specializing in world-wide reporting of adverse reactions in children to many areas of healthcare intervention. The question of safety is not a question; it has been investigated and there is no evidence of risk or a lack of safety for chiropractic care for children. I know of only one specialized association.(International Chiropractic Pediatric Association ICPA )
Please get a few comments across these arguments for your readers to consider.
In a general sense, however, I do suggest that it is difficult to cite the meaning and validity of research /reports and the substance of their references. This area of argument is best left to representation by academia / statisticians who continue to research and resolve these issued in their combined forum of publications.
As practicing health care professionals in clinical practice, we must focus on the patient in front of us every day. Whenever they are concerned about their health we must give honest counsel and support. The demonstration of improved health benefits to a GP and/or a chiropractor from a chiropractic treatment of the spine or related area is undeniable in clinical practice. It could be argued that to withhold a treatment that is know from clinical experience to be of benefit, is unethical. There is truth in delivering the least invasive care for a child as the most desirable. For example it is now the normal after years of medical experience in the USA to never administer antibiotics for the child presentation of an ear infection unless there has been confirmation that it is bacterial in origin.
Professor MacLennan’s belief that a parent who takes their child to a chiropractor is abusing their child is a most unfortunate and inappropriate comment. He does not explain his attack on parents; whether it is the lack of scientific evidence for chiropractic treatment or whether potential injuries are the basis of his belief that it is abusive for a parent to take their child to a chiropractor. I note that his opinion is out of step with the medical insurance industry. This fundamental watchdog does not share his safety concerns and chiropractic professional indemnity premiums are not subsided due to added risk concerns; Federal Government Report-Professional Indemnity
Dr Sue-Ellen Mckelvey-Chiropractor
Dr Brian Callan- Chiropractor